Difference between revisions of "Talk:YouTube"
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:bzc6p|bzc6p]] ([[User_talk:bzc6p|talk]]) 07:08, 31 May 2015 (EDT) | [[User:bzc6p|bzc6p]] ([[User_talk:bzc6p|talk]]) 07:08, 31 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
xattrs are not portable and will get lost when copying to a file system that doesn't have them (or when uploading it somewhere, like to IA) --[[User:Darkstar|Darkstar]] 08:53, 31 May 2015 (EDT) |
Revision as of 12:53, 31 May 2015
youtube2internearchive
https://code.google.com/p/emijrp/ contained a script which also handled upload to Internet Archive, but I can't find it any longer. --Nemo 06:28, 26 January 2015 (EST)
Options
Is it really necessary to explicitly call best A/V when youtube-dl it by default?
Also, why not embed the subs and thumbnail instead of make a separate file? Also why not xattrs for those of us with unix filesystems? Xattrs is only one extra flag.
My command is currently
youtube-dl -t --embed-subs --add-metadata --xattrs --console-title --embed-thumbnails
although I'm going to be incorporating elements from the suggested one into mine. The reasoning behind this is it's one file to send. That command is how I archive currently, it's changing though.
I'd appreciate hearing your input about why I may be wrong though. Thanks in advance,
--Vxbinaca 21:24, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
On your second note, I strongly believe it's better to have different things (video, thumbnail, subtitle) in separate files. Easier to access, process, categorize, recognize. I think it's worth the "trouble" of having three files (with the same name) instead of one.
bzc6p (talk) 07:08, 31 May 2015 (EDT)
xattrs are not portable and will get lost when copying to a file system that doesn't have them (or when uploading it somewhere, like to IA) --Darkstar 08:53, 31 May 2015 (EDT)