Difference between revisions of "Talk:Google+"

From Archiveteam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.
Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.


== Any plan to collect G+ community posts? ==
== Any plan to collect manually dump? ==


The dump by owners and moderators via Google official takeout.
The dump by Google official takeout. [[User:Zeronet|Zeronet]] ([[User talk:Zeronet|talk]]) 17:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:36, 2 April 2019

I wanted to start a discussion regarding the merits and flaws of archiving Google+. Obviously it's a big piece of internet history and it wasn't crawled even by google (at least not externally) so all the discourse will disappear when it closes. However there a huge amount of "noise", just chatter, that isn't worth archive and there's now heuristic for picking one over the other. Perhaps post length?

Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.

Any plan to collect manually dump?

The dump by Google official takeout. Zeronet (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)