Difference between revisions of "Talk:Google+"

From Archiveteam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I wanted to start a discussion regarding the merits and flaws of archiving Google+. Obviously it's a big piece of internet history and it wasn't crawled even by google (at lea...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.
Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.
== Any plan to collect manually dump? ==
The dump by Google official takeout. [[User:Zeronet|Zeronet]] ([[User talk:Zeronet|talk]]) 17:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:36, 2 April 2019

I wanted to start a discussion regarding the merits and flaws of archiving Google+. Obviously it's a big piece of internet history and it wasn't crawled even by google (at least not externally) so all the discourse will disappear when it closes. However there a huge amount of "noise", just chatter, that isn't worth archive and there's now heuristic for picking one over the other. Perhaps post length?

Please consider possible solutions. I think this bit of internet history deserves saving.

Any plan to collect manually dump?

The dump by Google official takeout. Zeronet (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)