Difference between revisions of "Recommended Reading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (move) |
m (reword) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Web 2.0 Bubble? == | == Web 2.0 Bubble? == | ||
It seems like the 2.0 bubble is a bit more resilient than the 1.0 bubble. The name might not be as apt, but the sites could be doomed to suffer the same fate as their forebears due to the recession. | It seems like the 2.0 bubble is a bit more resilient than the 1.0 bubble. The name might not be as apt, but the sites could be doomed to suffer the same fate as their forebears due to the recession. These articles are useful because they make a head-count and attempt to survey the situation. | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_dot-com_bubble "Second dot-com bubble" - article at Wikipedia] | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_dot-com_bubble "Second dot-com bubble" - article at Wikipedia] |
Revision as of 03:33, 15 January 2009
Web 2.0 Bubble?
It seems like the 2.0 bubble is a bit more resilient than the 1.0 bubble. The name might not be as apt, but the sites could be doomed to suffer the same fate as their forebears due to the recession. These articles are useful because they make a head-count and attempt to survey the situation.
- "Second dot-com bubble" - article at Wikipedia
- "The Web 2.0 Bubble" - article by The Atlantic
- "11 troubled Web companies" - article by CNet
- "Web 2.0 bubble bursting" - article at VentureBeat
New page, please add content --Ross 16:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)