Difference between revisions of "Valhalla"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
Mithrandir (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Options == | == Options == | ||
* Tapes | * Tapes | ||
* Paperbak | * [http://www.ollydbg.de/Paperbak/index.html PaperBack] | ||
* | * [http://ronja.twibright.com/optar/ Optar] | ||
* Blu-ray | |||
== Non-options == | == Non-options == | ||
* | * BitTorrent Sync | ||
* Ink-based Consumer Optical Media (DVD, | * Ink-based Consumer Optical Media (Blu-ray, DVD, etc.) | ||
* Amazon Glacier | * Amazon Glacier | ||
** [[User:Jscott]]: Amazon Glacier seems like a a great idea, until you realize they mean 1 cent per gigabyte per month. This is $120 per terabyte per year. | |||
Revision as of 22:07, 18 September 2014
This wiki page is a collection of ideas for Project Valhalla.
<SketchCow> Basically, we have this situation where we have stuff that is being threatened, and it's huge, and then it's either not so threatened or it's in a weird quantum state. So, this really stretches the bounds of what IA does. It's a huge amount of data, it's not likely to be overly touched if the originals are up, and IA will spend/lose a lot of money pulling it into their infrastructure. So maybe we can discuss actual, not pie-in-the-sky possibilities of what we can do to have some sort of not-IA pile of storage.
Options
Non-options
- BitTorrent Sync
- Ink-based Consumer Optical Media (Blu-ray, DVD, etc.)
- Amazon Glacier
- User:Jscott: Amazon Glacier seems like a a great idea, until you realize they mean 1 cent per gigabyte per month. This is $120 per terabyte per year.